Footnotes.
Well, until now, I’ve all but abandoned this blog. I stepped off the plane in Minneapolis and was thrust back into my perpetual academic routine. By 8AM the next morning, I was sitting in an Organic Chemistry lecture. I had no choice but to swiftly flip my functioning mode from South Africa to America. And so, for eight weeks, that’s what I did. I submerged myself in the mystical world of carbon, oxygen, hydrogen and friends, and filled my free time with work and Netflix binging. South Africa came up in conversation occasionally when I happened to run into someone I knew on campus or when members of my family who hadn’t seen me in a while inquired, “So, how was South Africa?” Though delighted to have the opportunity to share my experience, I always struggled to identify a starting point. How do I begin to tell the tale of three weeks in a first, but also third world country? Did people really want the whole story, the whole up and down of ethics and emotions, or were they simply looking to hear about the magnificent landscape and wonderful food? Following rapid analyses of these questions, my response was Minnesotanly typified: “Oh, it was so great. I learned so much and am so grateful I was able to go.” There was nothing distinct about it, nothing rousing or revolutionary. For any passerby unaware of my transatlantic adventure, my response might allude to a trip to anywhere from France to Fargo. And as much as I felt I was doing an injustice to my trip, my experience, my answer maintained its vacuity. That is, until I began reading for my final project.
Deciding how to respond to this inquisition too, how to represent and utilize my experience was excessively difficult. Beyond my needless indecisiveness, I wasn’t sure what I wanted to do with the information I had gained. I felt motivated to some sort of action, but despite my efforts, could not pinpoint a cause to support. I could volunteer somewhere, but that seemed to me, something more for myself than for others. My frustration grew as nothing seemed to fit. I felt selfish and exasperated. Three weeks in Africa and I couldn’t come up with anything to do with it!
Throughout the trip, an urge to learn and compare American and South Africa social history nagged me. Each time we encountered a similarity, my spaghetti brain would catapult into comparison, weaving a web of historical echo. The frequency of such unfortunate reverberation has always fascinated me. Even after reading, researching and relating with the histories, I am continually baffled by the recurrence of injustice and like crimes against humanity. Of all the portions of the past, why choose to double back on these? Even though I was perpetually vexed by this feeling, it never occurred to me that learning more about the answer to this question could be shaped into my final project.
And so I sought and selected two books. The first, The Highest Stage of White Supremacy, by John Whiston Cell, elects a strictly academic perspective on the subjects. His work offered me a pure juxtaposition of South Africa’s apartheid and the post-Civil War segregation in America, particularly in the South. This was my comfortable selection, free of real, first-hand emotions and straight to the facts. It was easy, expected, and relatively uninspiring. It didn’t move me. It didn’t really make me feel anything. It was just hard and dry, the economic and social explanation of segregation. While this was interesting, I don’t think it was what I needed for my debriefing. Flipping from the South Africa switch so quickly allowed me to put aside real reflection. I needed something to challenge me, to challenge my emotions and my experience. I needed something to make me analyze and even defend my experience, and that is exactly what Ilana Mercer’s Into the Cannibal’s Pot did.
I came out of the first pages swinging. My identity was under siege. For nearly three hundred pages, I was on the defensive, defending my trip abroad, protecting my understanding of American ideals, and shielding my global citizenship. While her arguments stood alone from those of Cell, I found myself ready to unload even at the times when her words did overlap. I’ve been trying to figure out why her words are seemingly so much more inflammatory than his. Into the Cannibal’s Pot was such a roller coaster. I was angry, then sad, then guilty, then confused. Her incendiary opinions in combination with her lack of citation and overwhelmingly belligerent delivery immediately destroyed any trust between the reader and author. I didn’t feel like I could trust her or anything she said. I’d experienced different things, met different people. What she was saying and what I’d lived were two distinct things. Everything I read, I reanalyzed and compared with my three weeks. Did I miss something? Was there a whole side of Cape Town of which I was completely unaware? I had interacted with Afrikaners during my stay, but could there really be another angle? I couldn’t imagine another side to this South African dodecahedron.
She generalized. She made accusations. It wasn’t fair. I knew these people she was belittling; I lived with them. They’d opened up their homes and hearts to me. To say that all Black South Africans are like this would be committing the same sin as she who claims that none such exist. Such absolutism is toxic and unfortunately contagious. I think that’s what upset me most: the fact that this sort of bigotry is available in an unchecked, unchallenged format. People, bedazzled by its five star reviews, will order this book off Amazon and accept it as a relative truth. Despite the ease of access, too many people accept things at face value. Because Mercer is a native Afrikaner who’s lived in America, she must have some power of omniscience. Granted, Mercer has first-hand experience that most of her readers lack. However, she abuses statistics and manipulates the oft confused correlation and causation. It is so frustrating continually encountering these misuses of facts and figures.
But this is perhaps what made the book what it needed to be. I encountered the heart of darkness about two thirds of the way through the book. All of a sudden, I was overwhelmed by this cloud of hate and unnecessary mistrust. This engrained disdain all at once painted the image of apartheid. The perpetuation of the situation was at last demystified. After over a hundred pages of being angry and defensive, I was suddenly sullen. “There is so much hate,” I jotted down in my book, “So much distrust. It’s so dark. I can feel it. This dark cloud of hate balled up in my chest. This is why things aren’t working…misinformation.”
At this point in the book, Mercer had gone on to attack not only members of the Colored and Black communities of South Africa, but also Afrikaner leaders such as F.W. de Klerk who had failed their people in compromising with Mandela, whom, as you might guess, she doesn’t much respect. She demonized Easterners, Westerners, Muslims (because the rise of their antediluvian religion in Africa is the reason for its corruption and decline), Christians, anyone not explicitly pro-Israel, and generally disgruntled readers. Those who were not with her were obviously against her (and by the above list of the accused, this is quite literal. There is no illusion of synecdoche here), members of a different species of sorts.
She was the company of the Jews of the Holocaust, a victim of diaspora. However in the same breath, she was the Atlas of Africa, bearing the weight of her brethren. While Cell’s work helped me to understand the ways in which these claims are true, the drastic nature of Mercer’s statements is insultingly hyperbolic. And I am but a third party in this situation, one without direct connections to the misfortunes she abuses. Her book lacks context, evidentiary statistics, and most importantly empathy. And in realizing this, the mechanism perpetuating hatred and distrust which transitively puppeteer social ideas of apartheid and the like were suddenly elucidated. Even though this feeling of clarity was and is so brilliant in my mind, I struggle to assign transcript, at least succinctly. In recognizing that her description lacked empathy, I became aware that mine did too. I was guilty of profiling people, of dismissing accounts, of becoming polarized by an incredibly strong and frigid headwind to the point of surrendering to groupthink. In this way, I was just as bigoted as I claimed Mercer to be. As terrible as it felt to have that heavy jaded mass in my gut, I’m thankful for it. If nothing else, it woke me up. Hello broadened global citizenship horizons.
Perspective is an incredibly powerful thing. And after my journey to Africa and trek through the minefield of Ilana Mercer’s mind, I don’t think walking in someone’s shoes is enough. You’re still yourself, just in someone else’s kicks. You still have your own ideas, beliefs, and prejudices, they just have a different footnote, literally. Empathy comes only after understanding which follows relation that comes with like experiences. You have to be challenged to understand what it means to overcome. You have to be uncomfortable to know contentment. You have to be oppressed to comprehend what it feels like to really be free.
After a couple months on hiatus, reading these books and reevaluating my time abroad was definitely what I needed in order to transition into the school year. As I reunite with friends I haven’t seen all summer, I’m sure I’ll be put in the South Africa hot seat on a regular basis. Now when asked how my trip was, I can break out of the Minnesotan mold and respond with a substantive answer. So now I invite you, as I did in my first blog, to be uncomfortable, seek a challenge, stretch yourself, boldly go where you would never ever go before. Discover, experience, juxtapose, understand, globalize. Go.
If you still need more convincing to go, or if you’d just like to see more of my trip pictures, click here.

